The hardware no longer kept up and I lost interest, faded screen made things pointless also.įast forward to today and with the new MBP I've also got a licensed version of CaptureOne 23.ġ. I then used CaptureOne 8, 9, and 11 to import from card and output edited as needed. Jpegs I just kept in folders, have most on my iPhone PhotoApp now. Upon Aperture's demise I consolidated all my RAWS, original Jpegs with numerous duplicate finders and swore I would only use referenced solutions from now on. (huge jump).īackground: Back in the day I had a managed library with iPhoto and Aperture for. depending on how you looked at things.Need some advice as have recently updated from a 2009 MBP to a M2 MBP. Things were so much simpler decades ago when many image quality upgrades were dependent on more acceptable terms since a different film or film processing chemicals - so consumables that one expected to pay for anyway. It's the same for Windows but being a more open to the third party markets product the timescale for the enforced HW change is usually a little longer. The bigger players have funded this in various ways in the past but a Subscription model seems to be taking over for the most dominant in the marketplace.Īpple seem to be doing things differently and funding through hardware sales with OS support for older hardware eventually constrained and forcing the upgrade issue. Both of those may introduce new technology or techniques that cannot successfully be accommodated into older software without changes. The same can be said for new cameras and, to some extent, new lenses. new code) that both users and supplier want to make use of then the software application developer is forced to deploy resources and incur costs to change or add to their own code. Secondly: If the new OS has new features and functionality (i.e. It also involves discovering whether all older hardware and connected devices are also still usable. Which way that turns out after a new OS final release may not be entirely evident for a few weeks. Capture One offers a subscription model so we have the option of adopting the Adobe update payment model rather than the perpetual license model if we prefer that method of funding.Īs for the Support of new versions of OS's - there are two major considerations.įIrstly: will the released version of the OS result in breaking software that currently uses some older technology? If there is no problem running older versions of the software then there is no problem for the user using older versions and avoiding an enforced application update to go with the new OS. I understand that if I would want a new version of capture one I need to pay, but to have a software I paid a lot just a few months ago to ask for more money just because of an OS update seems like a robbery to me." "How is it possible that capture one asks for more money for capture one to work when the computer OS is updated. If you then still face problems, maybe you can raise a support ticket to help Capture One to fix the problem, which then could result in a new maintenance release
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |